Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:38:55 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 2.6.26-rc: x86: pci-dma.c: use __GFP_NO_OOM instead of __GFP_NORETRY |
| |
* Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:23 am Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@xs4all.net> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 12:15 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@xs4all.net> wrote: > > > > > Okay, so how about this then ? > > > > > > > > applied to tip/pci-for-jesse for more testing. Thanks, > > > > > > I've thought about it a bit more, and I think the actual patch that > > > really does what everybody wants is this one instead: > > > > applied a delta patch version of the one below to tip/pci-for-jesse. > > Speaking of that branch, how do you want to handle it? Is it intended > for my linux-next branch or are some of the fixes important to get > upstream now? Which branch should I diff/log against to see the > changes (last time I looked it appeared neither master nor tip were > the correct ones...)
that branch is always based in -git so if stuff goes upstream patches disappear from it. git-log linus/master..tip/pci-for-jesse should tell the currently pending items. Right now it's just two lowprio items:
Yinghai Lu (2): pci: debug extra pci resources range pci: debug extra pci bus resources
Ingo
| |