[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for June 23
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Vegard Nossum <> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Vegard Nossum <> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Vegard Nossum <> wrote:
>>> Testing tracer sched_switch: PASSED
>>> Testing tracer sysprof: PASSED
>>> Testing tracer ftrace: PASSED
>>> Testing dynamic ftrace: PASSED
>>> Testing tracer irqsoff: PASSED
>>> Testing tracer preemptoff: PASSED
>>> Testing tracer preemptirqsoff: <4>------------[ cut here ]------------
>>> WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2680 check_flags+0x142/0x160()
>>> Pid: 2, comm: kthreadd Not tainted 2.6.26-rc6-next-20080620 #34
>> <-- Oops, wrong version :-(
>> Will try the latest one as well.
> Okay, I can confirm that this happens with today's tree too. I also
> get this (new) warning:
> mm/slub.c: In function 'kmem_cache_defrag':
> mm/slub.c:3046: warning: 'reclaimed' may be used uninitialized in this function
> Otherwise things seem to work good :-)

In fact, I got this stacktrace when I shut down (but I was in a hurry
so I didn't have the time to really investigate it):

$ addr2line -e vmlinux -i c01fd0c1

And additionally, the next two boots hung here (but the third one was okay):

I don't know what these issues are related too. I can try
debug_initcall for the hang.


"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-06-23 14:29    [W:0.205 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site