Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:19:29 +0900 | From | KOSAKI Motohiro <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][Patch 2/2] markers: example of irq regular kernel markers |
| |
> Peter, I thought, we were discussing what interface we could accept, > not how many or where tracepoints we could accept. Or, am I misreading? > > I know that if someone pushes markers into kernel in his own sweet way, > of course, the kernel code will be bloated endlessly. But I also know > why we review patches and send Ack/Nack before merging them to the tree. > (If you still worry about it, we might be able to make linux-markers > git tree, and review all regular markers on it)
Indeed.
if necessary, I can maintain this tree. (because, I hope marker is independent by LTTng and SystemTap. So, I am no related any tracer in this discussion member.)
but, at first, We should review and discuss to Mathieu's new tracepoint proposal. I think that is good idea.
| |