[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] net: via-velocity.c fix sleep-with-spinlock bug during MTU change
Francois Romieu a écrit :
> Séguier Régis <> :
> [...]
>> But if I generate a paquet with a size more than around 3825, the driver
>> don't send it and no paquet is send after, work again after an interface
>> down/up and until no paquet > 3825.
> Does it qualify as a regression ?
I couldn't say yes now.

To be honest, I never test mtu > 1500 with this driver before.

This can be detected before with the difficulty of mtu change?

I'll test the driver before patch with a bigger MTU. (i'll try to do
this next week)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-06-20 18:53    [W:0.063 / U:1.940 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site