[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCHES] Re: Is configfs the right solution for configuration based fs?
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 04:19:10PM +1000, Ben Nizette wrote:
> Looks great, thx :-). I'll convert some of my stuff over to this
> interface and see how it flies in the real world.

Excellent. What is your stuff, btw? Got code? Love to see it.

> ISTR when I did this I kept the old semantics and used ERR_PTR and
> friends if things went pear-shaped. Given the small number of in-tree
> users needing to be moved over, a more intrusive change for the sake of
> a cleaner API like you've done is probably a good thing anyway :-)

Yeah, I like this better than ERR_PTR.
If you like the macros, I'll try to make the next merge window
as well. So let me know.



"I almost ran over an angel
He had a nice big fat cigar.
'In a sense,' he said, 'You're alone here
So if you jump, you'd best jump far.'"

Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Phone: (650) 506-8127

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-06-20 09:01    [W:0.080 / U:0.916 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site