[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot transaction abstraction

On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Along the lines of:

Hell no. There's a reason we have a special set_wrprotect() thing. We can
do it more efficiently on native hardware by just clearing the bit
atomically. No need to do the cmpxchg games.


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-06-19 02:27    [W:0.043 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site