Re: PR_SET_SECCOMP and PR_GET_SECCOMP doc (and bug?)
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 03:32:29PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote: > even the status quo is fine, as long as it's documented. My only > doubt was that the status quo is a little "strange" so I wondered
I agree it's a little strange ;).
> whether there might have been some mistake. Anyway, if you do decide > to change something here, please CC me.