lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [sched-devel, patch-rfc] rework of "prioritize non-migratable tasks over migratable ones"
From
Date
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 19:59 +0200, Dmitry Adamushko wrote:

> One way or another, we have different aritifacts (and mine have likely
> more) but conceptually, both "violates" POSIX if a strict round-robin
> scheduling is required.

http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/xsh_chap02_08.html#tag_02_08_04_01

Is quite strict on what FIFO should do, and I know of two points where
we deviate and should work to match.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-06-16 21:19    [W:0.165 / U:0.844 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site