Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [sched-devel, patch-rfc] rework of "prioritize non-migratable tasks over migratable ones" | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:17:42 +0200 |
| |
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 19:59 +0200, Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> One way or another, we have different aritifacts (and mine have likely > more) but conceptually, both "violates" POSIX if a strict round-robin > scheduling is required.
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/xsh_chap02_08.html#tag_02_08_04_01
Is quite strict on what FIFO should do, and I know of two points where we deviate and should work to match.
|  |