Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:07:38 +0200 | From | Stefan Richter <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] 8139too: clean up spaces and TABs |
| |
Németh Márton wrote: > I have chosen the checkpatch.pl's output to compare the > whether the old and the new code are better or not. Maybe that was a mistake.
Well, running checkpatch on source files (rather than patches) and fixing the files up according to checkpatch's output and own good judgement has two uses: - bring new unmerged code into shape before submission, - bring older mainline code into the canonical form as a basis for further work. You certainly saw how lots and lots of such checkpatch-assisted cleanups went into arch/x86. That's because they were found useful for the work on unifying the two x86 architecture subtrees. So, a coding style rework has its use even on legacy code if people have plans with the code. But keep in mind that (a) the whitespace rules aren't hard and universally agreed upon rules, (b) coding style has a number of other aspects of arguably greater importance than whitespace style, like proper modularization, good choices of names, use of common idioms and APIs instead of own inventions, and so on. -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--- -==- =---- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |