[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Bug 10864] [regression][bisected] ~90,000 wakeups as of 2.6.26-rc3
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Németh Márton <> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I already mentioned at the bug report that 2.6.26-rc6 this is fixed.
>> Maybe tell your robot to first check the latest activities in the bug
>> report since the last -rc release. What I want also to tell your robot
>> that it should mention what actions should be taken in case the bug
>> should be still listed or when the bug can be closed.
> i think the current regression tracking methods that Rafael uses work
> very well and i'd like to thank Rafael for those efforts - to me as a
> subsystem maintainer it is a _very_ useful thing.
> In this case there was no real harm from the "this bug is already fixed"
> condition - just an extra email. Real harm would only come from missed
> regressions or from incorrectly closed regressions - but those are not
> happening.
> note that there is no "robot" involved in changing the state of bugs -
> the real important work here is done by Rafael and checking whether a
> bug is still relevant is an inevitably manual work. The mails and
> reports are auto-generated but crawling discussions and determining the
> status of a regression is very hard to automate.

Sorry, I thought a robot missed my comments in the bug tracking system for
the second time:

Comment was on 2008-06-06 13:27:16 ( )
The mail was coming: 7 Jun 2008 22:42:57 +0200 (CEST) ( )

Comment was on 2008-06-13 23:19:53 ( )
The mail was coming: 14 Jun 2008 22:12:04 +0200 (CEST) ( )

Nevertheless the bug #10864 can be closed I think.


Márton Németh
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-06-15 10:57    [W:0.074 / U:2.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site