Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:30:10 +0400 | From | Michael Tokarev <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] HP iLO driver |
| |
H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Altobelli, David wrote: >>> Wouldn't /dev/hpilo/ccbN be a more appropriate namespace? >> >> Yes, that would be more clear. The code is currently defined to a >> maximum of 1 hardware device, but this could change, and the dev path >> should probably reflect that. >> >> How do you feel about /dev/hpiloX/ccbN, where X is 0, 1, ... >> Num_Devices-1? > > I'd rather see /dev/hpilo/dXcY, the point being to try to declutter the > /dev root.
For a case when there will be only one, or, in very rare theoretical case, two devices, why bother in the first place? A subdirectory containing only one node is more ugly.. ;)
/mjt
| |