Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 9 May 2008 13:26:23 -0300 | From | "Glauber Costa" <> | Subject | Re: Possible regression? 2.6.26-rc1: T61s failure after suspend/resume |
| |
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> wrote: > On Fri, 9 May 2008, Glauber Costa wrote: > > > > I can't reproduce it neither, and looking at the code over and over > > again, see no obvious point for the breakage. I'll try to reproduce it > > myself, > > to see if I can spot something. But correct me if I'm wrong, this is > > all 64-bit machines, right? > > > > I'm stuck with mostly 32-bit hardware, but will give it a try anyway. > > The machine is 64-bit capable (Core2 Duo), but the kernels I'm running > for this are 32-bit, so I doubt that the 64-bitability is relevant. > I'd love to see what happens with a 64-bit kernel, but I never get > back from suspend with it (and that's not a recent regression). > Carlos is also seeing this with a 32-bit kernel (on P4 Xeon with HT). > > Please don't take my git bisection result too seriously: that's where > it led when I fudged things around enough, and treated blank screens > as manifestations of the problem, which very likely they're not > (there's some other bug which makes it very variable how quickly > I resume). And also, I wasn't checking how many cpus came up each > time: I wouldn't be surprised if at some points in your series only > one would come up, which would then look like a "good" point to me. > This is very unlikely. Exactly because I knew problems were likely to arise in such a delicate thing, I was extremely careful to make it not an issue. But yeah, ultimately, it can happen.
-- Glauber Costa. "Free as in Freedom" http://glommer.net
"The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act."
| |