lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86: introduce a new Linux defined feature flag for PAT support
On 08-05-08 12:19, Andi Kleen wrote:

>> Use a new Linux defined X86_FEATURE_PAT_GOOD feature flag to
>
> Better would be PAT_TESTED or PAT_RANDOMLY_APPROVED. Most of these
> CPUs without PAT_GOOD have actually perfectly good PAT, as Windows
> proves every day.
>
> The main flaw in all of this of course is that there is no procedure
> to test CPUs which do not have the flag set yet.

Quite. And hiding the fact that the CPU _should_ have perfectly good
PAT doesn't help any at all. The discussion turned into a mini-flame
war enough that now noone would even consider backing down, but this
current PAT setup just sucks plain and simple.

Rene.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-08 14:43    [W:0.301 / U:1.208 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site