Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 3 May 2008 23:25:27 -0700 (PDT) | From | dean gaudet <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH -mm crypto] AES: x86_64 asm implementation optimization |
| |
one of the more important details in evaluating these changes would be the family/model/stepping of the processors being microbenchmarked... could you folks include /proc/cpuinfo with the results?
also -- please drop the #define for R16 to %rsp ... it obfuscates more than it helps anything.
thanks -dean
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Sebastian Siewior wrote:
> * Huang, Ying | 2008-04-25 11:11:17 [+0800]: > > >Hi, Sebastian, > Hi Huang, > > sorry for the delay. > > >I changed the patches to group the read or write together instead of > >interleaving. Can you help me to test these new patches? The new patches > >is attached with the mail. > The new results are attached. > > > > >Best Regards, > >Huang Ying > > Sebastian >
| |