lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] 64-bit futexes: x86 support
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Also, doesn't this mean that effectively you have given up on any CPU
> before the Pentium entirely?

Yes, but only for the speed-up. Not for the functionality. All
programs will work just fine.


> Not that I want to take the patches _anyway_, but it seems doubly stupid.
> Those things are going to be UP machines, so you could have just emulated
> it with no correctness issues by disabling preemption.

First, you're thinking too much in kernel terms. At userlevel I cannot
disable interrupts etc. I cannot read 64 bits atomically on those
processors. Second, the old implementation is not significantly slower
in normal programs on UP machines. It's really not a big issue.


In any case, robbing 64-bit architectures of the possible performance
gain just because there are ancient versions which cannot do it is just
plain stupid. I know you cannot suggest that.

- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkhAw5QACgkQ2ijCOnn/RHTRRwCgv37woIjA5RJji4XamBQVqCyF
VMwAoIauSEdAlfK4pBJhMkIKirwEBw0z
=rDJc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-31 05:21    [W:0.057 / U:0.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site