[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC][Patch 5/5]integrity: IMA as an integrity service provider

On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 20:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

> > > - ima_fixup_inodes looks like it will race and crash against a
> > > well-timed unmount. I expect you will need to bump s_count before
> > > dropping sb_lock. See writeback_inodes() for an example.
> >
> > ima_fixup_inodes() is called once at initialization.
> What is "initialisation"? During initcalls? Are there even any files
> in cache at that time? I bet we can arrange for the answer to become
> "no".

Yes, during the initcalls. Is this possible even when using
late_initcall(). IMA is dependent on the TPM being available,
if it is being used.


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-30 15:09    [W:0.167 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site