Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 15/15] rfkill: document rw rfkill switches and clarify input subsystem interactions (v2) | Date | Thu, 29 May 2008 19:40:09 +0200 | From | Ivo van Doorn <> |
| |
On Thursday 29 May 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Thu, 29 May 2008, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > > On Thursday 29 May 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > > On Thu, 29 May 2008, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > > > > > This version better documents *_RFKILL_ALL. Is it good enough for an > > > > > ACK for patch 14 of 15? > > > > > > > > Yes, you can put my ack on patch 14. > > > > Thanks for the documentation update. :) > > > > > > Then, this entire batch is ready for merging. Now, if only Len would > > > come back from wherever he disappeared to, in order to merge the two > > > thinkpad-acpi patches, I could send it to netdev for merge. > > > > Actually, I believe the correct merge order would through wireless-dev, > > which means the patches should go to John Linville and linux-wireless in the CC. > > Noted. At merge time (which will be as soon as the thinkpad-acpi > changes hit mainline), I will send them to you, John, and > linux-wireless. > > Unless you want me to send them all right now to linux-wireless to see > if there are any comments?
Well why wait with merging it into wireless-dev until thinkpad-acpi is merged? I don't think there are real dependencies other then the SW_RFKILL_ALL define. Perhaps you could send the rfkill patches with SW_RADIO instead of SW_RFKILL_ALL and make the rename after the thinkpad and rfkill series have both been merged. That would probably be the fastest route for this patch series.
Ivo
| |