Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 27 May 2008 19:29:42 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: can UBIFS be taken to linux-next? |
| |
On Wed, 28 May 2008 11:41:12 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Artem, > > On Tue, 27 May 2008 09:18:07 +0300 Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> wrote: > > > > we would like to ask for UBIFS mainline inclusion the next merge window. > > Of course we cannot say for sure whether Linus will merge it or not, > > but it would be helpful to have it in your tree for some time anyway. > > UBIFS is already in -mm tree so I assume it should not have too many > > build issues. > > OK, my requirements are that you intend for it to be integrated in the > next merge window, that it be reviewed and that it be unit tested (i.e. > tested as well as you can in isolation). You seem to have done all that, > so I will add it. > > I will put it at the end of the merge today. > > Andrew, does that make sense to you?
I'm not aware of any issues which would block a 2.6.27 merge.
I haven't reviewed the filesystem myself. Christoph Hellwig seems to have had a good go through it and had numerous review comments, but it is unclear what stage things are at with addressing them?
| |