Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 21 May 2008 23:18:32 +0100 (BST) | From | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <> | Subject | Re: RTC subsystem and 11 min rtc update |
| |
On Wed, 21 May 2008, Philippe De Muyter wrote:
> Should update_persistent_clock not be directly part of the rtc subsystem, > instead of falling in a detour or a dead-end in the arch subsystem ?
See the recent discussion around my proposal:
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0805.1/1772.html
I am about to update some of the architecture bits in arch/mips/sibyte, but otherwise the patchset is ready to go. Feel free to join the discussion and/or update your platform to make use of the generic rtc_read_persistent_clock() and rtc_update_persistent_clock() functions. Testing is always welcome too.
Maciej
| |