Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 20 May 2008 21:47:59 -0700 | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] [2/11] Add unlocked_fasync |
| |
On Wed, 21 May 2008 01:35:21 +0200 Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> > > My concern is that the new API as long lived is ugly and not the > > right thing. I assume Linus and others have similar concerns, and > > weigh that over the "some obscure out of tree driver might break". > > What do you find ugly exactly? The prefix "unlocked_" ?
yes exactly
| |