lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3, RFC] misc char dev BKL pushdown
From
Date
Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com> wrote:

> this open func already has a spinlock protecting it. doesnt that mean
> we dont need the bkl in it ?

The existence of a spinlock is a good sign. But, until somebody has
looked at the code and verified that said lock is really protecting
everything, it's best to leave the BKL protection (which has always been
there, just at a higher level) in place.

jon


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-20 02:23    [W:0.103 / U:0.280 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site