lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] [2/11] Add unlocked_fasync
Alan Cox wrote:
>> The good news is that none of them I looked at actually needed BKL
>> (or perhaps I just missed it)
>
> Far better to send an initial patch that simply adds all the lock/unlocks
> then remove them later than worry about it immediately - that makes it
> easier to verify changes and to do testing

I fail to see how that makes it easier than with ->fasync_unlocked.

-Andi



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-19 17:49    [W:0.026 / U:0.384 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site