Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 19 May 2008 17:45:35 +0200 | From | Andi Kleen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] [2/11] Add unlocked_fasync |
| |
Alan Cox wrote: >> The good news is that none of them I looked at actually needed BKL >> (or perhaps I just missed it) > > Far better to send an initial patch that simply adds all the lock/unlocks > then remove them later than worry about it immediately - that makes it > easier to verify changes and to do testing
I fail to see how that makes it easier than with ->fasync_unlocked.
-Andi
| |