lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC] make wext wireless bits optional and deprecate them
From
Date
On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 14:16 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > Instead of testing for wireless/, best thing would probably be to call
> > SIOCGIWRANGE on the device and if it returns EOPNOTSUP then it's not
> > wireless. Some drivers may have to load firmware to figure out
> > supported rates and encryption capabilities, but to be honest, NM does
> > this to detect wireless devices and I haven't run into any issues in 4
> > years using it. If there are issues with drivers, then we need to fix
> > the driver too.
>
> I was about to propose calling SIOCGIWNAME since that is what
> wireless-tools do and that linux/wireless.h indicates.

Hmm; NAME is pretty useless. That's fine to do, I guess WEXT requires
that NAME return _something_ at least. NAME should never ever be used
for anything more, but since wireless-tools appears to do this that's
fine.

Dan




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-19 17:31    [W:0.086 / U:0.784 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site