Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 16 May 2008 14:37:21 -0700 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: Suspend/Resume bug in PCI layer wrt quirks |
| |
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:16:30PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, 16 of May 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Thursday, May 15, 2008 12:51 pm Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Some quirks should be called with interrupt disabled, we can't directly > > > call them in .resume_early. Also the patch introduces > > > pci_fixup_resume_early and pci_fixup_suspend, which matches current > > > device core callbacks (.suspend/.resume_early). > > > > > > TBD: Somebody knows why we need quirk resume should double check if a > > > quirk should be called in resume or resume_early. I changed some per my > > > understanding, but can't make sure I fixed all. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> > > > > I applied this one to linux-next, it should fix some of the problems people > > have been seeing at least... > > Well, that will collide with > pm-new-suspend-and-hibernation-callbacks-for-pci-bus-type.patch > in the Greg's tree. > > Greg, perhaps it's better if you drop it and I'll send an updated version to > Jesse? That will make his tree dependent on yours, but that will be okay, > won't it?
That's up to Jesse. I don't know if he can handle a depancy on an external tree.
Jesse?
| |