lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [PATCH -mm] kexec jump -v9
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:

> On Saturday, 22 of March 2008, Alan Stern wrote:

> The spec doesn't say much about that, so we'll need to carry out some
> experiments.

> Still, as far as I can figure out what the spec authors _might_ mean, I think
> that it would be inappropriate to restore the ACPI NVS area if S5 was entered
> on "power off". The idea seems to be that the restoration of the ACPI NVS area
> should complement whatever has been preserved by the platform over the
> hibernation/resume cycle.

> IMO, if S5 was entered on "powe off", there are two possible ways to go.
> Either ACPI is initialized by the boot kernel, in which case the image kernel
> should not touch things like _WAK and similar, just throw away whatever
> ACPI-related state it got from the image and try to rebuild the ACPI-related
> data from scratch. Or the boot kernel doesn't touch ACPI and the image kernel
> initializes it in the same way as during a fresh boot (that might be difficult,
> though).

Just an added data partial point. In the kexec case I have had not heard
anyone screaming to me that ACPI doesn't work after we switch kernels.

So I expect shutting down ACPI and restarting it should work reliably
and that is easy to test as that is already implemented with kexec.

Eric


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-15 00:43    [W:0.217 / U:0.304 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site