Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:50:14 -0400 | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix |
| |
Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> wrote: > >>> We've got three thousand Kconfig options - it is clearly not >>> realistic for users to keep such details in mind to avoid pitfalls. >> Agreed -- hence the multiple announcements, including in this thread, >> to put said details into mind. > > which part of "it took a kernel developer more than an hour to figure > out why his laptop had a dead network interface" did you not understand? > Whatever you did, it was not apparent to me. I dont follow every tiny > detail of the e1000 driver family, nor do 99%+ [*] of our users.
You do follow LKML, where multiple announcements have and are being posted.
Jeff
| |