Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 9 Apr 2008 20:22:06 +0400 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/4] set_restore_sigmask TIF_SIGPENDING |
| |
On 04/09, David Woodhouse wrote: > > One of the supposed advantages of TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK in the first > place, iirc, was that it allowed us to return a result code other than > -EINTR as _well_ as restoring the signal mask.
Agreed, good point. ERESTART_ is not that flexible.
Somehow I assumed we will never need something "special" here, this is not very clever.
Thanks to all!
Oleg.
| |