Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 9 Apr 2008 19:18:38 +0400 | From | Cyrill Gorcunov <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9 |
| |
[Ingo Molnar - Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 05:03:33PM +0200] | | * Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote: | | > | > It seems that commit 883a9fc4e5d9b0701f15d4e5a23608f942104721 | > | > ("x86: cleanup - rename VM_MASK to X86_VM_MASK") from the x86 tree | > | > seems to have missed some places. | > | | > | i think what happened is that some changes came in from other trees | > | that reintroduced the old symbols? | > | > actually, that is the only explanation I could find. The last time I | > sent you patches to fixup *all* VM_MASK (wich were grep'ed on *latest | > branch over *all* sources inside x86). So this all were settled down | > by a few of my patches and /for shame on me/ yours fixups. So these | > fixups were missed on merging. | | no, the problem turned out to be that i kept those fixes too spread out, | and part of them went into the x86/for-akpm portion of the tree, part of | it went into x86/testing. Since all x86 developers work against | x86/testing this was never a problem - only now did it become one when i | shuffled patches and branch boundaries around. Such problems will go | away once linux-next starts using x86/testing as well. In any case i | moved your fixes together and fixed up the patch ordering as well. | | Ingo |
ok, i see, thanks
- Cyrill -
| |