Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 7 Apr 2008 16:01:55 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 6/6] Clocklib: use correct name for 3,6MHz clock |
| |
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:24:11 +0400 Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> > --- > arch/arm/common/sa1111.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c b/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c > index eb06d0b..282a4d9 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c > +++ b/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c > @@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ __sa1111_probe(struct device *me, struct resource *mem, int irq) > if (!sachip) > return -ENOMEM; > > - sachip->clk = clk_get(me, "GPIO27_CLK"); > + sachip->clk = clk_get(me, "3_6MHz_CLK"); > if (!sachip->clk) { > ret = PTR_ERR(sachip->clk); > goto err_free;
Again, there's just not enough information for us (well: me) to be able to evaluate this patch.
For example, if the current name is "incorrect" then why shouldn't we fix it in 2.6.25? 2.6.24? etc.
|  |