[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: BUG: using smp_processor_id() during suspend with 2.6.25-rc8
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:

> > I know. However preempt_count is a little bit inconsistent in such cases
> > though.
> And? interrupts off beats preempt count anyways. Why did you write the
> patch? Was there a (incorrect) warning triggered?

Reported at

BTW is also mce_init() (called from mce_resume()) guaranteed to run with
IRQs off?

Jiri Kosina

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-08 00:13    [W:0.061 / U:4.820 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site