Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 8 Apr 2008 00:11:17 +0200 (CEST) | From | Jiri Kosina <> | Subject | Re: BUG: using smp_processor_id() during suspend with 2.6.25-rc8 |
| |
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I know. However preempt_count is a little bit inconsistent in such cases > > though. > And? interrupts off beats preempt count anyways. Why did you write the > patch? Was there a (incorrect) warning triggered?
Reported at http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/7/130
BTW is also mce_init() (called from mce_resume()) guaranteed to run with IRQs off?
-- Jiri Kosina
|  |