Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 8 Apr 2008 00:12:10 +0200 | From | Andi Kleen <> | Subject | Re: BUG: using smp_processor_id() during suspend with 2.6.25-rc8 |
| |
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 12:04:39AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > It is not safe to call smp_processor_id() in cases we are not sure > > > someone will not reschedule us. > > We are sure. Machine checks always run with interrupts off. > > I know. However preempt_count is a little bit inconsistent in such cases > though.
And? interrupts off beats preempt count anyways.
Why did you write the patch? Was there a (incorrect) warning triggered?
-Andi
|  |