Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 6 Apr 2008 22:48:56 -0700 (PDT) | From | Christoph Lameter <> | Subject | Re: [patch 02/10] emm: notifier logic |
| |
On Sat, 5 Apr 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > + rcu_assign_pointer(mm->emm_notifier, e); > > + mm_unlock(mm); > > My mm_lock solution makes all rcu serialization an unnecessary > overhead so you should remove it like I already did in #v11. If it > wasn't the case, then mm_lock wouldn't be a definitive fix for the > race.
There still could be junk in the cache of one cpu. If you just read the new pointer but use the earlier content pointed to then you have a problem.
So a memory fence / barrier is needed to guarantee that the contents pointed to are fetched after the pointer.
|  |