Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.25-current-git hangs on boot unless CONFIG_CPU_IDLE=n-Apple | Date | Mon, 7 Apr 2008 01:20:28 +0200 |
| |
On Monday, 7 of April 2008, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > On Sun 6.Apr'08 at 23:01:50 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Saturday, 5 of April 2008, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > > > On Fri 4.Apr'08 at 13:41:45 -0700, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote: > > > > > > > >>> Can you try the latest git and see whether this still is a problem? > > > > >> > > > > >>I've just updated to latest git, but it may take some time for it > > > > >>to happen again (the first 3 boots were okay). Last time it happened > > > > >>with 2.6.25-rc7-00149-gaf8be4e (I checked now). > > > > >> > > > > >>Do you have reasons to believe this issue was fixed since then? > > > > > > > > > >Yes. I think the patch here should have fixed the problem.... > > > > >Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120674502201007&w=4 > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmmmm.... Looking at latest git, > > > > The above patch is not yet in git. Can you please apply the above patch > > > > and see whether do you still see the problem..... > > > > > > OK, I will apply it manually and test it. > > > > > > For the record: yesterday my laptop hang at boot with v2.6.25-rc8-139-ge315c12 > > > (without the above patch). > > > > Carlos, please add yourself to the CC list at > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10093 > > Rafael, I added myself to bug 10117 instead of 10093. > > I am sorry about this confusion, but the References: to > both bug 10093 and 10117 are this email from Soeren > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/23/263 (and this is how I got > to this thread) > > That is the hang which happens in my laptop with latest git. > You can check that by looking at this picture I took while > my laptop was hung http://www.ift.unesp.br/users/crmafra/dsc04673.jpg > > However you closed bug 10117, but that is not fixed for me so I am > going to reopen it if you don't mind.
OK
Well, perhaps we should mark bug #10093 as a duplicate of bug #10117 or vice versa. Soeren, are they really different?
> By the way, thanks for all your effort to track down these regressions.
You're welcome. :-)
Thanks, Rafael
| |