Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 4 Apr 2008 22:48:29 +0300 (EEST) | From | "Ilpo Järvinen" <> | Subject | Re: WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2173 tcp_mark_head_lost+0x173/0x1a0() |
| |
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 09:20:38PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 21:19:13 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > (cc netdev) > > > > > > (and Rafael - I assume 2.6.24 didn't do this..) > > > > urgh. > > > > > On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 15:41:37 -0700 "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > > > > (Please CC, not on LKML). > > > > > > > > One of the nodes in my web-serving cluster (isohunt.com) started showing this: > > > > > > > > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > > > WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2173 tcp_mark_head_lost+0x173/0x1a0() > > > > Modules linked in: lm85 hwmon_vid nfs lockd nfs_acl sunrpc bonding reiserfs k8temp hwmon i2c_nforce2 i2c_core sg > > > > Pid: 32500, comm: php-cgi Not tainted 2.6.25-rc4-git2 #7 > > I misread that as -rc8. > > We fixed a lot of stuff since -rc4. Please retest current mainline? > > Hopefully this is new enough. -git3 was released right while I was writing this > email after testing, and I don't see anything in there that seems related. > > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:1771 tcp_enter_frto+0x2bb/0x2c0()
Is this _the first one_ you encounter? It's very strange place because tcp_enter_frto won't touch those sacked_out / lost_out counters at all so it hardly could cause an overflow there.
-- i.
| |