Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:17:16 -0700 | From | Randy Dunlap <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] docbook: fix fatal rapidio yet again (and more to come) |
| |
Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Apr 30, 2008, at 5:11 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On Thu, 1 May 2008 08:09:24 +1000 Paul Mackerras wrote: >> >>> Andrew Morton writes: >>> >>>>> Odd. I thought Paul had picked up a docbook RapidIO patch from you in >>>>> the latest merge round. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Well it's more than "a" patch. The six-week-old patch series is: >>>> >>>> rapidio-add-memory-mapping-driver-to-rapidio.patch >>>> rapidio-add-rapidio-space-allocation-bitmap-arithmetic.patch >>>> rapidio-add-fsl-rapidio-controller-memory-ops-functions.patch >>>> rapidio-add-the-rapidio-master-port-maintance-and-doorbell-window-to-space-resources.patch >>>> >>>> rapidio-add-rapidio-proc-fs-for-memory-mapping-debugging.patch >>>> rapidio-add-the-memory-mapping-support-in-rionet-driver.patch >>>> rapidio-fix-docbook-references.patch >>>> rapidio-fix-kernel-doc-problems.patch >>> >>> What happened is that you (Andrew) sent them on to me pretty much >>> unexamined. I took a look at them and dropped one of them because it >>> created a new /proc file. I asked Kumar to look at them and he had >>> issues with another three of the patches, and dropping those meant >>> that all the following ones (including the fix-kernel-doc one) >>> wouldn't apply, so I dropped them too. I applied the rest and sent >>> them to Linus. >>> >>>> (seems that I forgot to cc Jeff on the rionet change too). >>> >>> Yeah. I nearly dropped that one too. I probably should have. :) >>> >>>> Oh well. If nobody puts their hand up in the next 24 hours or so >>>> I'll just >>>> send it all in to Linus. >>> >>> Please don't. At this stage I think the best thing is for Kumar to >>> talk to Zhang Wei (they both work for Freescale, so that should be >>> possible in theory :) and get him to rework the remaining patches as >>> required for inclusion in 2.6.27. >> >> Just to be clear, the docbook changes shouldn't wait for 2.6.27. >> There's no need for that. > > Can the docbook be respun against linus's tree?
Sure, I'll do that later, hopefully tonight.
-- ~Randy
| |