Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:43:52 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [patch 0/4] Bootmem cleanups |
| |
* Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de> wrote:
> Hi Ingo, > > I now dropped the node-crossing patches from my bootmem series and > here is what is left over. > > They apply to Linus' current git > (0ff5ce7f30b45cc2014cec465c0e96c16877116e). > > Please note that all parts affecting !X86_32_BORING_UMA_BOX are > untested! > > arch/alpha/mm/numa.c | 8 ++-- > arch/arm/mm/discontig.c | 34 ++++++++++----------- > arch/ia64/mm/discontig.c | 11 +++---- > arch/m32r/mm/discontig.c | 4 +-- > arch/m68k/mm/init.c | 4 +-- > arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-memory.c | 3 +- > arch/parisc/mm/init.c | 3 +- > arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 3 +- > arch/sh/mm/numa.c | 5 +-- > arch/sparc64/mm/init.c | 3 +- > arch/x86/mm/discontig_32.c | 3 +- > arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c | 6 +--- > include/linux/bootmem.h | 7 +--- > mm/bootmem.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++------------------- > mm/page_alloc.c | 4 +-- > 15 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)
i've read them and the changes all look sane and well-structured - but the impact is way too cross-arch for this to even touch x86.git i guess. I suspect this is for -mm?
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Ingo
| |