lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [rfc] SLQB: YASA
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 05:17:39PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Hi
>
> > > Why is this not a patch set against SLUB?
> >
> > It's a completely different design of the core allocator algorithms
> > really.
> >
> > It probably looks quite similar because I started with slub.c, but
> > really is just the peripheral supporting code and structure. I'm never
> > intending to try to go through the pain of incrementally changing SLUB
> > into SLQB. If SLQB is found to be a good idea, then it could maybe get
> > merged.
>
> Do you have performance mesurement result?
> I hope see it if possible.
>
> Thanks! :)

Nothing really interesting, unfortunately. I have run some tests on
various microbenchmarks like tbench and things like that. But I
don't have many good ideas for more meaningful tests where slab
allocation performance is critial. Any suggestions? :)

Thanks,
Nick


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-03 10:29    [W:0.051 / U:0.408 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site