Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 3 Apr 2008 10:26:51 +0200 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: [rfc] SLQB: YASA |
| |
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 05:17:39PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > Hi > > > > Why is this not a patch set against SLUB? > > > > It's a completely different design of the core allocator algorithms > > really. > > > > It probably looks quite similar because I started with slub.c, but > > really is just the peripheral supporting code and structure. I'm never > > intending to try to go through the pain of incrementally changing SLUB > > into SLQB. If SLQB is found to be a good idea, then it could maybe get > > merged. > > Do you have performance mesurement result? > I hope see it if possible. > > Thanks! :)
Nothing really interesting, unfortunately. I have run some tests on various microbenchmarks like tbench and things like that. But I don't have many good ideas for more meaningful tests where slab allocation performance is critial. Any suggestions? :)
Thanks, Nick
| |