lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Recreating RAID1 after the reckless mdadm usage
also sprach Artem S. Tashkinov <birdie@permonline.ru> [2008.04.03.0746 +0200]:
> mdadm --create --assume-clean --verbose /dev/md0 --level=1 --force
> --raid-devices=2 /dev/sda1 missing (which is obviously the right command).
>
> After doing that I see that my data on a recreated /dev/md0 is there (It
> seems like it's intact). Is it safe to use this RAID1 and is my data
> safe? Can I now add the second block device to md0 using 'mdadm /dev/md0
> -a /dev/sdb1' command?

Looks good. Although you should not use --force or --assume-clean,
you wouldn't have needed them, but they also don't make a difference
in the above command.

--
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/

the united nations did a poll about food. the only question they asked
was: "could you please give your honest opinion about a solution for
the shortage of food in the rest of the world?" this poll failed
because:
- in africa they didn't know what food was....
- in eastern-europe they didn't know what honest was....
- in western-europe they didn't know what shortage was...
- in china they didn't know what opinion was...
- in the middle-east they didn't know what solution was...
- in south-america they didn't know what please was...
- and in the usa they didn't know what "the rest of the world" was...

spamtraps: madduck.bogus@madduck.net
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-03 09:19    [W:0.041 / U:0.424 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site