Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 4 Apr 2008 10:18:07 +0900 | From | KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <> | Subject | Re: cgroup_disable=memory for 2.6.25? |
| |
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 13:41:53 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 01:57:14 +0530 > Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > I expected those patches to make it into 2.6.25. > > My mind-ray receptors might need a tune-up. > > > Could we please push these patches upstream before 2.6.25? Or is it too late? > > Should be OK. I borrowed a bit of Hugh's email and stuck it in the changelog > so that it at least has some attempt to describe why it's an urgent change.
For example. Unix bench's execl test result on x86_64 was
== just after boot without mounting any cgroup fs.== mem_cgorup=off : Execl Throughput 43.0 3150.1 732.6 mem_cgroup=on : Execl Throughput 43.0 2932.6 682.0 ==
I believe this is worth ot be urgent.
I'm now trying performance improvement patches but it's too late.
Thanks, -Kame
| |