Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 3 Apr 2008 18:32:39 -0400 | From | Erez Zadok <> | Subject | Re: [patch 01/10] vfs: add path_create() and path_mknod() |
| |
In message <E1JhJwR-0008Vv-2x@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>, Miklos Szeredi writes: [...] > If it wants to handle that case nicely, it can monitor /proc/mounts > and reflect it in it's superblock flags. And it can take a write-ref > on the underlying fs if it has outstanding dirtyness. But we should > not _rely_ on ecryptfs to ensure that it's never writing to a > read-only mount.
I'm all for reducing the need for stackable f/s such as ecryptfs from having to remember to manage the write counts. A stackable filesystem has to emulate some parts of the VFS when it calls into a lower f/s: in that case, having useful VFS helpers that do as much of the work as possible, saves a lot of hassle.
> Miklos
Cheers, Erez.
| |