Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 03 Apr 2008 14:40:10 +0300 | Subject | Re: [ofa-general] InfiniBand/iWARP/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.26 (what's in infiniband.git) | From | Tziporet Koren <> |
| |
Roland Dreier wrote: > Send with invalidate should be OK. Let's see about the masked atomics > stuff -- we have a ton of new verbs and I think we might want to slow > down and make sure it all makes sense. > OK - will send and then we will see what will come out.
> > What about the split CQ for UD mode? It's improved the IPoIB > > performance for small messages significantly. > > Oh yeah... I'll try to get that in too. > thanks > > mlx4- we plan to send patches for the low level driver only to enable > > mlx4_en. These only affect our low level driver. > > No problem in principle, let's see the actual patches. > Sure > > I think we should try to push for XEC in 2.6.26 since there are > > already MPI implementation that use it and this ties them to use OFED > > only. > > Also this feature is stable and now being defined in IBTA > > Not taking it causing changes between OFED and the kernel and your > > libibverbs and we wish to avoid such gaps. > > Is there any thing we can do to help and make it into 2.6.26? > > I don't have a good feeling that the user-kernel interface is well > thought out, so I want to consider XRC + ehca LL stuff + new iWARP verbs > and make sure we have something that makes sense for the future. > > I see - but can't we figure this all for the 2.6.26 window?
Tziporet
| |