Messages in this thread | | | From | David Brownell <> | Subject | Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.25-git] gpio: sysfs interface | Date | Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:55:39 -0700 |
| |
On Tuesday 29 April 2008, Ben Nizette wrote: > 4) Status quo. Easy, efficient, potentially hard to discover which gpio > you actually want. > > My vote's for 1 or 4. The first one is heavier but easier. The last > one will need something like the discussed file mapping ranges to gpios.
My vote is for #4 with a chip listing file.
I don't like the hacked names ... none of the other /sys/class/*/name files on any of my systems use hacked names. The entire motivation for name hacking seems wrong to me, and by observation it's been rejected for all other class names.
- Dave
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |