Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:41:51 -0700 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/10] sysfs tagged directories |
| |
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 01:04:45PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Greg KH (gregkh@suse.de): > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 07:10:15PM +0200, Benjamin Thery wrote: > > > Here is the announcement Eric wrote back in December to introduce his > > > patchset: > > > > <snip> > > > > Are the objections that Al Viro made to this patchset when it was last > > sent out addressed in this new series? > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > Which objections were those? The last submission which I see by Eric > was http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/1/15 this past December. I see no > response from Al and get the feeling you were ok with them. > > So my hunch would be that Eric had addressed those before that last > submission, but if not I'm sorry, and please do set me straight.
See the thread from Al starting with: Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:24:17 +0000 From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, htejun@gmail.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@suse.de Subject: [RFC] netns / sysfs interaction Message-ID: <20080107072301.GW27894@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
He had a lot of questions and objections to this way forward, and I share those objections.
thanks,
greg k-h
| |