lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: umount(/proc) after CLONE_NEWNS in 2.6.25?
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 02:47:18AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 07:27:59PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > > [pid 6308] clone(child_stack=0xbfc9de94, flags=CLONE_NEWNS|SIGCHLD) = 6309
> > > [pid 6309] execve("/usr/sbin/umount", ["umount", "-n", "/proc"])
> > > ...
> > > [pid 6309] oldumount("/proc") = -1 EBUSY (Device or resource busy)
> > > umount: /proc: device is busy
> > >
> > > Yes, various NAMESPACEs are enabled (i'm trying to experiment with
> > > those).
> > >
> > > Is it intentional?
> >
> > It's very odd. Could you bisect that down to offending changeset or
> > at least narrow the things down to -rc<something>? I'm going down right
> > now, so won't be able to look into that until tonight...
>
> Check the version of umount(8) you've got. And see if that strace happens
> to have open of /proc/mounts, without matching close by the time it calls
> umount(). util-linux-ng 2.13.1 is _that_ dumb...

Umm... Looks like something more odd is going on...


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-29 04:09    [W:0.690 / U:0.208 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site