Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 28 Apr 2008 08:32:28 +0200 | From | Seewer Philippe <> | Subject | Re: Kconfig 'depend' vs. 'select' |
| |
Arjan van de Ven wrote: [snip] > how far would "if you DEPENDS on FOO, and FOO is =m, you can only be =m or =n" get us? > or are there hidden traps on this? > (the hard case is if a non-tristate DEPENDS on a tristate, but... that's a trap anyway) I guess it depends on the (use-)case. But in general I'd like a system like that, especially if it would spew out warnings and errors for cases like the one mentioned.
| |