Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:49:04 +0200 | From | Heiko Carstens <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched_domains code |
| |
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:32:22AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> wrote: > > > /* doms_cur_mutex serializes access to doms_cur[] array */ > > static DEFINE_MUTEX(doms_cur_mutex); > > > > +static inline void lock_doms_cur(void) > > +{ > > + mutex_lock(&doms_cur_mutex); > > +} > > > @@ -7813,8 +7811,10 @@ int arch_reinit_sched_domains(void) > > int err; > > > > get_online_cpus(); > > + lock_doms_cur(); > > thanks, that looks a lot more clean already. May i ask for another > thing, if you are hacking on this anyway? Please get rid of the > lock_doms_cur() complication now that it's not conditional - an open > coded mutex_lock(&sched_doms_mutex) looks more readable - it gives a > clear idea about what's happening. Also, please rename sched_doms_mutex > to something less tongue-twisting - such as sched_domains_mutex. Hm?
Your wish is my order:
Subject: [PATCH] sched: fix locking in arch_reinit_sched_domains
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Concurrent calls to detach_destroy_domains and arch_init_sched_domains were prevented by the old scheduler subsystem cpu hotplug mutex. When this got converted to get_online_cpus() the locking got broken. Unlike before now several processes can concurrently enter the critical sections that were protected by the old lock.
So use the already present doms_cur_mutex to protect these sections again.
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> --- kernel/sched.c | 20 +++++--------------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rt_rq, init static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(task_group_lock); /* doms_cur_mutex serializes access to doms_cur[] array */ -static DEFINE_MUTEX(doms_cur_mutex); +static DEFINE_MUTEX(sched_domains_mutex); #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED #ifdef CONFIG_USER_SCHED @@ -358,21 +358,9 @@ static inline void set_task_rq(struct ta #endif } -static inline void lock_doms_cur(void) -{ - mutex_lock(&doms_cur_mutex); -} - -static inline void unlock_doms_cur(void) -{ - mutex_unlock(&doms_cur_mutex); -} - #else static inline void set_task_rq(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int cpu) { } -static inline void lock_doms_cur(void) { } -static inline void unlock_doms_cur(void) { } #endif /* CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED */ @@ -7755,7 +7743,7 @@ void partition_sched_domains(int ndoms_n { int i, j; - lock_doms_cur(); + mutex_lock(&sched_domains_mutex); /* always unregister in case we don't destroy any domains */ unregister_sched_domain_sysctl(); @@ -7804,7 +7792,7 @@ match2: register_sched_domain_sysctl(); - unlock_doms_cur(); + mutex_unlock(&sched_domains_mutex); } #if defined(CONFIG_SCHED_MC) || defined(CONFIG_SCHED_SMT) @@ -7813,8 +7801,10 @@ int arch_reinit_sched_domains(void) int err; get_online_cpus(); + mutex_lock(&sched_domains_mutex); detach_destroy_domains(&cpu_online_map); err = arch_init_sched_domains(&cpu_online_map); + mutex_unlock(&sched_domains_mutex); put_online_cpus(); return err;
| |