| Subject | Re: Breakage caused by unreviewed patch in x86 tree | From | James Bottomley <> | Date | Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:10:11 -0400 |
| |
On Sun, 2008-04-27 at 15:00 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > James Bottomley wrote: > > I might add that the intel SAPIC functions > > in roughly the same manner, so this might break more than just voyager. > > Are you referring to the IA64 SAPIC here, or something else? The only > mention of SAPIC in the x86 tree appear to be naming of fields in ACPI > tables.
Yes, that's the one ... but I believe a class of the xAPICs also used a similar principle.
James
|