Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:15:16 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [patch] ftrace, v15 |
| |
* KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Hi Ingo, > > > the current/latest ftrace tree can be pulled from: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-sched-devel.git > > > > the full diffs are too large to be included here, but the shortlog and > > the diffstat is below. Not much changed in the fundamentals since the > > last lkml posting - but many small details were refined. > > I hope ftrace people discussio LTTng people more. AFAIK nobody explain > pros. and cons. ftrace against marker approach. (of cource, LTTng > people doen't explain it too)
check the tree :-) It has these commits too:
Markers use imv jump Linux Kernel Markers - Use Immediate Values Markers - define non optimized marker Markers - remove extra format argument
LTTng instrumentation net LTTng instrumentation mm LTTng instrumentation kernel LTTng instrumentation ipc LTTng instrumentation fs
[ the latter ones are only there for testing - Mathieu is working on a different approach for syscall instrumentation. ]
Enjoy,
Ingo
| |