Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 26 Apr 2008 11:26:07 -0700 (PDT) | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Subject | Re: If you want me to quit I will quit |
| |
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > It also depends on whare you are located in the dependency tree.
Absolutely.
> Being kbuidl maintainer I have very few people that actually pull me git > tree (except from -mm and -next). So I rebase at will and have so far > not got a single complaint from anyone pulling my tree.
I agree. Some trees are so specific (and/or simply don't have enough patches in them) that it simply doesn't matter if two different people pull the same tree. Even if it might end up causing some duplication of commits (because the pulled tree might end up being then pulled further), it's not a big deal if it's rare.
In fact, we have always had duplicated commits even when they are passed around as email - just because perhaps two different trees simply needed the same fix, and rather than wait for it, they both integrated it (and then when they get merged, the same patch exists twice in the history, just with different committer info etc).
So yeah, rebasing ends up being really convenient if you really don't expect to have any other "real" end users than eventually being pulled into my tree (or, even more commonly, and when rebasing is *really* convenient: when it's just you keeping track of your own private patches in your own private tree and don't know if they will *ever* go upstream at all).
> But people like Davem and Ingo sits much higher in the dependency chain > and thus they have a very different set of users and thus a different > set of problems to take into account.
Yes. David has changed his workflow to accomodate others, while Ingo still does the rebasing (and it works out because nobody else works on his trees using git).
Linus
| |