Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 27 Apr 2008 02:43:21 +1000 | From | Stephen Rothwell <> | Subject | Re: Announce: Semaphore-Removal tree |
| |
Hi Willy,
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 09:59:39 -0600 Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> wrote: > > It's in addition to, and it's independent of it. I don't intend to > create any conflicts or dependencies between them. In case I do ... > let's say semaphore-removal goes after semaphore.
OK, added.
-- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |